A pile of documents wrapped as a gift on a desk, with a sticky note reading 'be ready by Thursday'

Turn raw context into live knowledge

New hire, new project, new client, new launch, cross-team move. Drop in your raw context, get an interactive protocol. You'll listen → drill → chat → test until it sticks. Own it by Thursday.

Load context → Raw materials in · ready by day X · no courses, no authors, no LMS

Not an LMS. Raw materials in. Start yesterday.

An LMS needs six weeks, an instructional designer, and a course author before anyone sits down to learn.

brainload needs your raw materials and a deadline. The protocol starts today.

Setup

What Day 0 actually looks like.

Both promise “training on your stuff.” The difference is where you are at the end of week one.

LMS — Day 0
Six weeks before anyone learns.
  • Hire instructional designer
  • Scope the course, write objectives
  • Build curriculum (4–6 weeks)
  • Configure SCORM / xAPI
  • Publish, launch comms
  • Hope someone takes it
brainload — Day 0
Person learns today.
  • Drop raw materials (Notion, Drive, Slack, code, regs)
  • Set the deadline
  • Mentor-bot starts in Slack today
  • 17 min/day, verified by day X

What we do

We don’t train people. We make sure they’re ready — by a specific day.

Most onboarding is “read and pray”: docs, calls, and hope it sticks. It doesn’t.

You don’t just learn it. You load it.

Built on proven learning science: spaced repetition and active recall.

× Not an LMS — no content authoring.
× Not a chatbot — no random Q&A.
× Not sales-only — works for any role.
AI-generated protocol, built from your real data, verified by tests.

Who it’s for

Anywhere people need to load context fast.

01 / consulting

Project ramp-up

New client, new industry, new context. Project-ready in days, not weeks.

02 / hr

Employee onboarding

Replace the PDF + mentor-call grind. Verified completion, not assumed.

03 / sales

Sales enablement

New product, new territory. Reps actually retain the playbook.

04 / ops

Role transitions

Internal moves, succession, knowledge handover before someone leaves.

More: post-merger integration · compliance updates · pitch prep · crisis response.

How it works

Sandwich: AI → methodologist → AI.

Two layers of AI with a learning expert in the middle. AI scales. The human keeps the program honest.

Three layers, not one.

01 — AI ingests

Your Slack threads, decision docs, customer calls, transcripts.

02 — Human shapes

Adult learning principles, cognitive load theory, spaced repetition. Decides what to compress, what to drill, what to test.

This layer doesn’t exist in any foundation model.

03 — AI delivers

Flashcards, audio at the right moment, scenarios in Slack, mastery test on day 7.

We use Claude, GPT, and ElevenLabs as infrastructure. The methodology is ours.

01 · AI

Ingest & map

AI reads your raw materials — wherever they live (Glean, Confluence, Notion, Google Drive, Slack, GitHub, or your on-prem stack) — and produces a structured knowledge base plus a menu of learning methods that fit this specific domain.

02 · HUMAN

Methodologist designs the program

A learning expert picks methods, sets pace, defines pass criteria, and tunes the plan to the role and the deadline. Not a template — a real plan.

03 · AI

Run the loading protocol

AI assembles and delivers the protocol day by day. A mentor-bot runs short sessions in Slack or Teams — wherever the employee already works — consults on demand, and verifies knowledge with tests and free-form Q&A.

A foundation model answers your question.
brainload makes your team ready by Thursday.

Works with your stack

Plugs into where your knowledge already lives.

Glean · Confluence · Notion · Google Drive · SharePoint · Slack · GitHub · your on-prem store.

Read-only via your existing permissions. Cloud or on-prem deployments. No data migration.

Real example

Onboarding a junior analyst on a new regulatory domain.

A real case: MiFID II compliance, after the €100,000 Wonderinterest fine (Dec 2025). All three sandwich stages spelled out.

Brainload process: AI ingest, methodologist program design, AI protocol delivery
01 · AI / INGEST · Day 0

Knowledge base + method menu

AI processes raw materials and produces a structured knowledge map of the domain, plus a menu of learning methods that fit it.

→ inputs
  • MiFID II directive + ESMA guidelines
  • Wonderinterest CySEC ruling
  • 4 internal SOPs + governance policy
  • 2 hours of senior compliance officer interviews
← AI output
  • knowledge map: ~120 atomic facts
  • 18 decision points + 9 edge cases
  • method menu: dialogues, scenarios, flashcards, roleplay, free-form Q&A
  • every fact cited back to the source
02 · METHODOLOGIST · Day 0–1

The program

A learning expert reviews the AI output, picks methods, sets pace, defines pass criteria, and tunes the plan to the role and the deadline.

→ structure
  • 7 days, ~45 min/day
  • Day 1–3: foundation — dialogues + flashcards
  • Day 4–5: applied — scenarios + roleplay
  • Day 6: edge cases + free-form Q&A practice
  • Day 7: final test + live-review readiness
← pass criteria
  • quiz: 85%+
  • free-form Q&A: 7/10 on rubric
  • scenario roleplays: 3/3 passed
  • can cite source on any decision
03 · AI / PROTOCOL · Day 1–7

Mentor-bot in Slack runs the protocol

AI assembles and delivers the daily protocol. The mentor-bot meets the employee in Slack — short sessions wherever convenient. Its job: prepare and verify.

→ exercises & format
  • 4 × 6–8 min audio dialogues, commute-friendly
  • ~10 flashcards/day, spaced repetition
  • 2 progressive quizzes (Day 3, Day 5)
  • 3 scenario roleplays: bot plays a CySEC inspector, a difficult client, a sales colleague pushing a non-compliant product
  • free-form Q&A: employee answers in their own words; bot grades against a rubric and returns feedback
  • on-demand consult: “what does ESMA say about X?” — bot answers from the knowledge base, with citation
← the bot’s job
  • delivers sessions in Slack/Teams — where the employee already works
  • tracks completion and recall over time
  • spots weak spots, schedules extra reps
  • evaluates free-form answers, not just multiple choice
  • flags the methodologist if the employee is off-track
04 · OUTCOME · Day 7

Tested, verified, ready.

Not signed-off — actually verified. Numbers and capability, not just a completion certificate.

→ measured
  • quiz: 92% (pass: 85%)
  • free-form Q&A: 8/10 (pass: 7/10)
  • scenario tests: 3/3 passed
  • citation accuracy: 100%
← capability
  • spots gaps a checklist would miss
  • assesses real client risk in own words
  • flags governance failures with rationale
  • ready for live review on Day 7

Why us

Built on proven systems.

This is our third application of the same learning engine. The same primitives that drive measured language retention and certified medical training, now turned on corporate knowledge.

listen.talk
language acquisition · measured retention

Greek language A2 in weeks, not years. Spaced repetition, AI dialogues, real comprehension tests. The pedagogical engine.

scanchild.eu
medical protocols · zero-error tolerance

Certified pediatric medical protocols with AI-assisted video analysis. The rigour: medical-grade verification, real patient outcomes.

Proof

Numbers, not vibes.

6w → 7d
From standard ramp-up to Brainload loading. The main outcome.
~50%
forgotten in 24h — without Brainload
Ebbinghaus forgetting curve
retention — with Brainload
Cepeda 2008 (n>14k) / Karpicke 2011

First design-partner pilots run summer 2026. Per-cohort results published. Design partners see the numbers first.

The desk after Brainload — organized, ready, on time

Test brainload protocol with my context

Free pilot — limited spots

Drop your context. Get a working protocol back.

Tell us what you need to load — new role, new project, new regulation, anything — and share the raw materials. We’ll build you a free test loading protocol on it: an interactive plan tuned to your case.

  • Audio podcasts — commute-friendly dialogues on your material
  • Flashcards — spaced-repetition deck of the atomic facts
  • Scenario quizzes — applied roleplays, not multiple choice
  • Final test — verifies you actually loaded it, free-form Q&A graded against a rubric
  • Direct founder feedback after you run through it

Turnaround under a week. We reply within 24 hours.

Questions

Honest answers to the obvious objections.

Won’t OpenAI or Anthropic build this?

Foundation labs are brilliant at answering questions. But shaping a learning protocol for a real person — what to compress, what to drill, when to push, when to back off — needs a human who can read the situation.

That’s our architecture: human-in-the-loop. The AI scales delivery; the methodologist keeps the program honest for this person, on this deadline.

The labs have models. We have learners.

Why not just build a custom GPT on our docs?

A custom GPT is a search interface — it answers what you ask.

brainload sequences a protocol for a specific person learning a specific thing by a specific date. Picking the right mix — audio on the commute, flashcards in 5-minute windows, scenarios in Slack, mastery test on day 7 — requires reading the human, not just the docs.

Our methodologist makes those calls. The AI executes them.

Are you a wrapper around GPT?

The model is one of three layers. The other two — human-in-the-loop methodology and outcome verification — are most of the value, and all of the IP.

What our human brings is years of working directly with learners:

  • listen.talk — what actually works with adult language learners (and what doesn’t, no matter how clever the prompt)
  • scanchild.eu — certified pediatric medical training: zero-error tolerance, real outcomes
  • Katya runs Feldenkrais Method trainings — deep work with attention, neuro-patterns, and how the body and mind actually learn

We use foundation models the way Stripe uses banks. Infrastructure, not product.